chairman. Essentially, from this reform, it is exhibited that even early on, Marcos had a
desire to centralise power to orbit himself. As president he had access to the given
powers associated, such as the right to executive orders and martial law, both of which,
he used to controversial lengths at some point in his reign. As seen in, most notably,
the controversial proclamation of martial law in 1972 and various formations of commit-
tees such as the Financial and Fiscal Policy Committee established by Executive Order
No. 242, signed 1970 . In the time of martial law, Marcos ran a centralised authoritative
27
regime, and thus, the Philippines was under the control of Marcos and his military.
Which entailed policies such as the closure of all independent media, curfews, loss of
the freedom of speech and general limitations/loss of liberty . "
28
Economically, in the majority of western media you can find all sorts of articles explor-
ing the detrimental impact which Marcos had on the Philippines. Essentially the sole
picture of what is remembered of Marcos in the West, is that of, the corrupt dictator or
as the Economist puts it “thief” , of whom, stole from, and left the Philippine economy
29
in a detrimental state . However, there is also a perception that Marcos brought in
30
economic prosperity. In his first term as president, Marcos essentially delved into vari-
ous major changes and projects which aimed to improve the Philippines, as well as,
exhibit “competence” . In particular, the infrastructure projects did indeed become no
31
-
table and effective in swaying a positive view of Marcos, as emphasised by my family
friend, Lorena Torre “Without Marcos there would not be the Juanico Bridge and the
32